Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

爱马仕发力高级定制,仍然看好中国的机会

阿克塞尔•杜马斯表示,在其他公司正在遭受重创的时候,该集团仍计划在中国扩张。

利用“杀手细胞”来战胜癌症,是一门好生意吗?

抗癌战争的下一阶段可能是利用患者自身的血细胞来对抗疾病。

供应链超级英雄是如何保持世界贸易流动的?

平板家具巨头宜家成功抵御了新冠疫情和乌克兰战争的冲击。

Palantir如何利用人工智能击败华尔街的质疑者

以与情报机构合作而闻名的软件公司将人工智能热潮推向标准普尔500指数。

纽约市长埃里克•亚当斯被指控收受土耳其方面的贿赂和礼物

联邦检察官在刑事案件中起诉美国最大城市的民主党领导人。

路威酩轩支持盟可睐首席执行官增持奢侈夹克制造商股份

这笔交易允许雷莫•鲁菲尼增持这家意大利公司的股份。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×