The risk of a replay of the lost decade in US stocks - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
美国股市

The risk of a replay of the lost decade in US stocks

The misallocation of capital in the economy will fuel inflation

The writer is chief executive and chief investment officer of Richard Bernstein Advisors

No economic model would have predicted stocks would be at all-time highs and credit spreads would be very narrow after the Federal Reserve raised its benchmark interest rate by 5.25 percentage points since early 2022. Yet, that is exactly what has happened. 

The Fed seems ready to declare victory in its fight against inflation, but the outperformance of highly speculative investments suggests that even such a sharp increase in interest rates hasn’t been a big enough mop to soak up the excess liquidity sloshing around the financial markets.

Central banks still don’t seem to understand that financial bubbles are sources of future real asset inflation. Bubbles misallocate capital within an economy to unneeded assets (cryptocurrencies and meme stocks, perhaps?). And capital doesn’t flow to productivity-enhancing investment. Indeed, the US consumer price index finally peaked at 5.6 per cent subsequent to the technology bubble in 2008.

There is evidence that speculation could again be curtailing the Fed’s inflation-fighting power, but the central bank seems blind to this. Investors shouldn’t be.

Historically, the performance of higher and lower quality has been consistent across asset classes. Smaller capitalisation stocks’ relative performance versus larger stocks tends to mimic credit spreads — the interest rate corporates pay over benchmark levels. That is because smaller, lower-quality companies have greater operating and financial leverage and are more influenced by the economic and profit cycles. 

In other words, small cap stocks tend to outperform large caps and credit spreads tighten when corporate profits improve, but large caps tend to outperform and credit spreads widen when profits deteriorate.

Speculation over the past two years has significantly distorted this long-standing inter-market quality relationship. Large cap stocks have outperformed small cap stocks despite profits accelerating and credit spreads tightening. This has been primarily driven by the so-called Magnificent Seven tech stocks — Apple, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, Nvidia and Tesla. The result has been a narrow market leadership and an emphasis on higher-quality stocks. Fixed-income performance, however, has been broader, and more cyclical with lower-quality credit benefiting.

This extreme divergence suggests three possible outcomes. First, the Magnificent Seven’s outperformance might be ignoring the broad improvement in corporate cash flows, whereas narrow credit spreads are correctly accounting for the cyclical upturn. This seems reasonable because the US profits cycle is accelerating and roughly 160 S&P 500 companies now have earnings growth of 25 per cent or more.

A second scenario could be that the equity market’s extremely narrow leadership is justified because an apocalyptic credit event is lurking. Goldman Sachs has pointed out the 1930s was the last time equity market leadership was as narrow as it is today. 

Narrow leadership makes economic sense during a depression because companies are struggling to survive let alone grow. Today’s narrow leadership, however, is accompanied by accelerating corporate earnings and a healthy banking system. Thus, a significant credit event of the magnitude that would justify such narrow equity market leadership seems unlikely. 

A third scenario could be that excess liquidity is fuelling speculation in both the equity and the fixed-income markets, and that neither the Magnificent Seven’s outperformance nor the tight credit spreads are appropriate. There’s certainly evidence of speculation in both markets. If this scenario is the appropriate interpretation, then equity market segments not typically defensive, such as emerging markets and smaller caps, might prove to be havens should the volatility of the current stock market leaders increase.

Although odd, there is a precedent for this. When the technology bubble began to deflate in March 2000, the overall stock market began the “lost decade” during which the S&P 500 had a modest negative annualised return for 10 years, but energy stocks, commodities, emerging markets, and smaller caps performed extremely well.

From March 2000 to March 2010, the S&P 500’s annualised total return was negative 0.7 per cent a year and the S&P 500 Technology sector was down 8.0 per cent a year. However, the S&P 500 Energy sector was up 9.4 per cent a year, the S&P Small Cap Index was up 6.6 per cent a year, and MSCI Emerging Market Index was up 10.0 per cent a year.

Those segments benefited from the reallocation of capital away from technology stocks, but also from post-bubble inflation spurring their profits. The Fed’s past could be the prologue. Capital is again being misallocated within the economy, yet the Fed still doesn’t seem to appreciate that misallocated capital kindles future inflation. 

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

对话Otter.ai的梁松:我们可以从会议和对话中获取有价值的数据

这家会议转录初创公司的联合创始人认为,我们甚至可以用虚拟形象代替自己进行工作互动。

朔尔茨迎来自己的“拜登时刻”

德国总理受到党内压力,要求其效仿美国总统拜登退出竞选。

欧盟极右翼党团在气候和高层任命问题上获得更多支持

欧洲议会中右翼议员正越来越多地与极右翼联手瓦解该集团的绿色议程,并推动更严格的移民限制措施。

毛利人对新西兰后阿德恩时代的民粹主义转向感到愤怒

卢克森的保守党政府推翻了前总理的许多进步政策。

Lex专栏:英伟达令人炫目的增长与每个人都息息相关

这家芯片巨头的盈利对美国股票投资者来说是一件大事,这不仅仅是因为其3.6万亿美元的市值。

欧洲比以往任何时候都更需要企业增长冠军

欧洲正在急切地寻找企业增长冠军,FT-Statista按长期收入增长对欧洲企业进行的首次排名展示了这方面的可能性。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×