Dutch government averts collapse after Wilders backs down - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
荷兰

Dutch government averts collapse after Wilders backs down

Far-right leader reverses at last minute on emergency law to curb immigration

The Dutch government has averted collapse over migration policy after far-right leader Geert Wilders backed down over a demand for drastic measures potentially in breach of EU law.

His Freedom party, one of the four coalition partners in the Netherlands, scrapped a plan to declare a migration crisis, which would have allowed the adoption of further measures without parliamentary consent.

Instead, centre-right coalition partner New Social Contract convinced Wilders to settle for a draconian refugee policy set to be approved by the cabinet on Friday, which will have to be endorsed by parliament.

These include cutting residency rights for refugees from five to three years, allowing some to be returned to parts of Syria, scrapping quotas for housing refugees, and reintroducing border controls as Germany has done, two party officials told the Financial Times.

The compromise is the latest attempt by centrist forces in the three-month old government to rein in anti-Islam firebrand Wilders, whose party won the most seats in last year’s election, sending shockwaves through the EU.

But even as the cabinet’s break up had been averted for now, it remained a strong probability, said Sarah de Lange, politics professor at the University of Amsterdam.

“The government might last a little longer. However, it is becoming increasingly unstable due to the lack of competence displayed by various Freedom party ministers.”

The latest was a visit to Uganda by trade minister Reinette Klaver last week when she said the Netherlands could send failed asylum seekers to the country. 

Prime Minister Dick Schoof, who is not a member of any of the four coalition partners, knew nothing about the plan in advance and was forced to defend it as a “serious idea” at his first EU summit.

The next day, Uganda’s foreign minister told Dutch radio the subject wasn’t discussed, only “Dutch support for refugees who are already in Uganda”.

The government’s actions are “shameful”, said Jesse Klaver, leader of the Greens — an opposition party that together with the Dutch Labour party is the second-largest bloc in the national parliament.

“The fiercest opposition the prime minister gets is from Wilders, not from the opposition, because we try to come up with plans and ideas and have a real debate.

“But Wilders just goes after him and in a very arrogant way.

“These centre-right parties enabled the new radical right party to be in the centre of power of the Netherlands. And that’s unique. I hope this is a once in a lifetime [event].”

The other three parties in government say they had little choice but to work with Wilders as he won the most seats. They blocked the veteran MP, who lives in a safe house and is guarded round the clock because of death threats, from being prime minister. Now he is acting “like he’s still in opposition”, said Klaver.

Rob Jetten, leader of D66, a liberal party that ended Mark Rutte’s government last year when he tried to tighten migration policy, said the new team achieved little in their first 100 days except budget cuts.

Billions of euros were slashed from education, health and research in September’s budget.

“We have had 100 days of fighting within the coalition, both in the government and between the coalition parties. 

“We’ve been talking about the so-called migration crisis now for three months and literally nothing, nothing has happened. They’re not delivering.”

But Dirk Gotink, a member of the European parliament from NSC, said the government was tackling the failures of Rutte’s coalition. 

The country’s sole asylum holding centre was overwhelmed, the budget deficit was growing and the country was breaching nitrogen pollution limits. Gotink said the budget deficit was scheduled to hit 3 per cent, the maximum allowed under EU rules, and the budget cut it to 2.5 per cent.

“The last government spent away their political disagreements by funding everything. We have to be ready for the next economic shock.”

De Lange says Wilders would welcome a snap vote but does not want to be the cause of government collapse. In Dutch politics, “the breaker pays”, she said. 

“He has to strike a delicate balance between showing he is principled and responsible, all while steering towards new elections so that NSC will implode and a three party coalition in which Wilders has the upper hand can be formed.”

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

Lex专栏:亚洲将遭遇“特朗普交易”的冲击

汽车行业保护主义抬头的定价过程才刚刚开始。

马斯克对特朗普的押注得到了回报

特斯拉和X的首席执行官将成为特朗普总统身边最具影响力的政治和商业顾问之一。

巴尼耶削减养老金的计划触动了法国人的神经

法国总理的这一省钱提案遭到反对,尽管人们呼吁加强代际公平。

英国学费上涨对学生和大学财务状况的影响

专家称,这些措施不足以解决高等教育经费问题或吸引来自贫困家庭的学生。

这次美国大选对美国企业意味着什么?

大选结果将对能源、汽车和制药等领域的企业产生重大影响。

德国的商业模式失败了吗?

德国三大主要产业同时陷入低迷,经济也停滞不前。政客们终于清醒过来了吗?
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×